An omphalocele is a congenital abdominal wall defect characterized by herniation of the abdominal viscera through the abdominal wall at the umbilicus covered by a membrane rather than by skin. The umbilical cord inserts into the mass and the umbilical vessels drape over the surface of the mass.
Omphalocele
Abstract: An omphalocele is a congenital abdominal wall defect characterized by herniation of the abdominal viscera through the abdominal wall at the umbilicus covered by a membrane rather than by skin. The umbilical cord inserts into the mass and the umbilical vessels drape over the surface of the mass before entering the abdomen. When omphalocele is isolated and the defect small, neonatal outcome is good. Multiple congenital anomalies and/or chromosomal abnormalities are observed in 80% of fetuses. These infants carry significantly more co-morbidity than those with an isolated omphalocele and outcome depends on the underlying etiology. Postnatal outcome also depends on the type of surgical closure; infants able to have primary closure typically have the best outcome. Infants with a ‘giant’ omphalocele are at risk for chronic lung disease (CLD), feeding problems, prolonged hospital stay and lower chance of survival
Key words: Omphalocele, abdominal wall defect, exomphalos, Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome.
Synonyms: abdominal wall defect, exomphalos.
Author: Nina Peters1
- Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Reviewers: Dr Edwin Guzman, Dr Angela Ranzini
View the Patient Information leaflet
Definition
An omphalocele is a congenital abdominal wall defect characterized by herniation of the abdominal viscera through the abdominal wall at the umbilicus. The omphalocele mass is covered by a membrane, not skin. The umbilical cord inserts into the mass and the umbilical vessels drape over the surface of the mass before entering the abdomen.
ICD code
ICD 10- XVII Q79.2
Incidence
An omphalocele occurs in 3.4 of 10,000 pregnancies and 1-2 per 10,000 live births.1
Pathogenesis
During the fourth to fifth week of embryonic development rapid growth of the intestines and liver occurs, and the abdominal wall is formed. At eight weeks gestational age the abdominal cavity is too small for its contents and the bowel protrudes through the abdomen into the base of the umbilical cord. This herniation is a temporary physiological midgut herniation which is visible on ultrasound from 9-12 weeks gestational age. If this herniation is present after 12 weeks gestational age it is no longer physiological and is classified as an omphalocele. Normally, the liver is never outside the abdominal cavity during development. Therefore, if the liver protrudes into the base of the umbilical cord, the herniation is considered pathological at any gestational age.
The protruding abdominal organs are covered by a two-layered membrane composed of amnion and the peritoneum. The umbilical cord inserts into the membrane, and the cord vessels drape over the mass before entering the abdomen.2, 3
Etiology
The etiology of isolated omphalocele remains unclear. When additional abnormalities are suspected, there is a strong association with chromomal abnormalities, in particular trisomy 18.
Pathology
Omphaloceles can be divided into small and giant omphaloceles. A small (or minor) omphalocele can often be closed primarily, which is mostly done within 48 hours after birth. If the postnatal defect size equals or is larger than 5 cm, with liver (partly) protruding4, closure is usually delayed in view of the viscero-abdominal disproportion.5 Infants with such a ‘giant’ omphalocele are at risk of pulmonary hypoplasia, feeding problems and prolonged hospital stay.6-9
Associated anomalies
In up to 80% of omphalocele cases, additional anomalies, most commonly, Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome are present. Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome can be suspected in cases of omphalocele with large fetal size and polyhydramnios. Organomegaly of the liver, kidney and tongue may be identified, commonly in the third trimester. The most common associated structural abnormalities are cardiovascular abnormalities, followed by gastrointestinal and urogenital anomalies.10-12
Recurrence risk
Most cases of omphalocele are sporadic and have a low risk of recurrence among first degree relatives. When an omphalocele is a feature of a genetic condition, the condition determines the pattern of inheritance. The most common genetic syndrome associated with omphalocele is Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. This syndrome can occur sporadically with a low recurrence risk, but also familial with an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern.
Diagnosis
In centers with good screening ultrasound protocols, 90% of neonates with omphalocele and most of the additional anomalies are detected by prenatal ultrasound from 11 weeks' gestation onwards.1, 13 Small omphaloceles can sometimes elude prenatal detection unless careful attention is paid to the appearance of the umbilical cord insertion site (SLIDE.) In approximately one third of cases prenatally thought to be isolated, additional anomalies are detected after birth.11, 14, 15 These additional anomalies may influence postnatal outcome, including type of closure.
Previous studies have shown that ultrasound parameters can predict postnatal outcome in fetuses with an omphalocele.16-22 The ratio between the omphalocele circumference (OC) and the abdominal circumference (AC), the OC/AC-ratio, can predicts the method of postnatal surgical closure.19, 21 The OC/AC-ratio is measured by dividing the omphalocele circumference by the abdominal circumference at the level of the defect with exclusion of edema.19 An OC/AC-ratio in second trimester of 0.66 or higher may predicts a the need for delayed closure of the defect after birth (unpublished data.)
Differential diagnosis
In the differential diagnosis of an omphalocele one should consider a body stalk anomaly, Pentalogy of Cantrell, gastroschisis and cloacal malformations.
Implications for sonographic diagnosis
When an omphalocele is suspected, a thorough search for associated anomalies and invasive testing to determine chromosomal abnormalities is recommended. The fetal heart should be carefully evaluated. Follow-up scans to check for fetal growth, and amniotic fluid volume, calculation of the OC/AC-ratio as well as liver, kidney and tongue size and are recommended.
Prognosis
Neonates with isolated omphaloceles have a good prognosis and up to a 96% survival rate. Depending on the type and number of associated anomalies, survival rates decrease to 14%.11
Neonates typically have normal mental development. Motor delay at age 2 is seen more often in children with a giant omphalocele compared to those with a small omphalocele.6
Management
When omphalocele is identified, an advanced anomaly scan should be performed. Chromosome testing with either chorionic villus testing between 11-13 weeks of gestation, or amniocentesis should be offered if available. Genetic consultation can be considered, especially in the presence of associated anomalies or a suspicion of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. Counselling by a pediatric surgeon birth as well as counselling by a fetal medicine specialist can be helpful since the prenatal and postnatal frames of reference regarding an omphalocele differ considerably.6 Termination of pregnancy, especially if additional abnormalities or a chromosome abnormality is found, should be discussed in countries where this is an option. Delivery at a center with excellent neonatal and pediatric surgery facilities is advised. A vaginal delivery can be performed in the majority of cases with cesarean delivery reserved for the usual obstetric indications. Postnatal screening for associated anomalies at the discretion of the pediatric team is recommended.
Surgical repair includes either primary or delayed closure of the abdominal wall defect. The approach chosen depends on the size of the omphalocele and/or presence of pulmonary hypoplasia and/or associated anomalies.
References
1. European Surveillance of congenital anomalies (EUROCAT) Guide 1.4 Section 3.3 2014 [Available from: www.eurocat-network.eu.
2. Duhamel B. Embryology of Exomphalos and Allied Malformations. Arch Dis Child. 1963;38(198):142-7.
3. Cyr DR, Mack LA, Schoenecker SA, Patten RM, Shepard TH, Shuman WP, et al. Bowel migration in the normal fetus: US detection. Radiology. 1986;161(1):119-21.
4. Bauman B, Stephens D, Gershone H, Bongiorno C, Osterholm E, Acton R, et al. Management of giant omphaloceles: A systematic review of methods of staged surgical vs. nonoperative delayed closure. J Pediatr Surg. 2016;51(10):1725-30.
5. van Eijck FC, de Blaauw I, Bleichrodt RP, Rieu PN, van der Staak FH, Wijnen MH, et al. Closure of giant omphaloceles by the abdominal wall component separation technique in infants. J Pediatr Surg. 2008;43(1):246-50.
6. Hijkoop A, Peters NCJ, Lechner RL, van Bever Y, van Gils-Frijters A, Tibboel D, et al. Omphalocele: from diagnosis to growth and development at 2 years of age. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018.
7. Partridge EA, Hanna BD, Panitch HB, Rintoul NE, Peranteau WH, Flake AW, et al. Pulmonary hypertension in giant omphalocele infants. J Pediatr Surg. 2014;49(12):1767-70.
8. Rijhwani A, Davenport M, Dawrant M, Dimitriou G, Patel S, Greenough A, et al. Definitive surgical management of antenatally diagnosed exomphalos. J Pediatr Surg. 2005;40(3):516-22.
9. van Eijck FC, Aronson DA, Hoogeveen YL, Wijnen RM. Past and current surgical treatment of giant omphalocele: outcome of a questionnaire sent to authors. J Pediatr Surg. 2011;46(3):482-8.
10. Barisic I, Clementi M, Hausler M, Gjergja R, Kern J, Stoll C, et al. Evaluation of prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of fetal abdominal wall defects by 19 European registries. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;18(4):309-16.
11. Cohen-Overbeek TE, Tong WH, Hatzmann TR, Wilms JF, Govaerts LC, Galjaard RJ, et al. Omphalocele: comparison of outcome following prenatal or postnatal diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;36(6):687-92.
12. Khalil A, Arnaoutoglou C, Pacilli M, Szabo A, David AL, Pandya P. Outcome of fetal exomphalos diagnosed at 11-14 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39(4):401-6.
13. Kelly KB, Ponsky TA. Pediatric abdominal wall defects. Surg Clin North Am. 2013;93(5):1255-67.
14. Heider AL, Strauss RA, Kuller JA. Omphalocele: clinical outcomes in cases with normal karyotypes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(1):135-41.
15. Conner P, Vejde JH, Burgos CM. Accuracy and impact of prenatal diagnosis in infants with omphalocele. Pediatr Surg Int. 2018;34(6):629-33.
16. Diemon N, Funke K, Mollers M, Hammer K, Steinhard J, Sauerland C, et al. Thorax-to-head ratio and defect diameter-to-head ratio in giant omphaloceles as predictor for fetal outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295(2):325-30.
17. Kiyohara MY, Brizot ML, Liao AW, Francisco RP, Tannuri AC, Krebs VL, et al. Should we measure fetal omphalocele diameter for prediction of perinatal outcome? Fetal Diagn Ther. 2014;35(1):44-50.
18. Montero FJ, Simpson LL, Brady PC, Miller RS. Fetal omphalocele ratios predict outcomes in prenatally diagnosed omphalocele. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(3):284 e1-7.
19. Peters NC, Hooft ME, Ursem NT, Eggink AJ, Wijnen RM, Tibboel D, et al. The relation between viscero-abdominal disproportion and type of omphalocele closure. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;181:294-9.
20. Tassin M, Descriaud C, Elie C, Houfflin Debarge V, Dumez Y, Perrotin F, et al. Omphalocele in the first trimester: prediction of perinatal outcome. Prenat Diagn. 2013;33(5):497-501.
21. Kleinrouweler CE, Kuijper CF, van Zalen-Sprock MM, Mathijssen IB, Bilardo CM, Pajkrt E. Characteristics and Outcome and the Omphalocele Circumference/Abdominal Circumference Ratio in Prenatally Diagnosed Fetal Omphalocele. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy. 2011;30(1):60-9.
22. Kamata S, Usui N, Sawai T, Nose K, Fukuzawa M. Prenatal detection of pulmonary hypoplasia in giant omphalocele. Pediatr Surg Int. 2008;24(1):107-11.
This article should be cited as: Peters, N.C.J., Omphalocele, Visual Encyclopedia of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, www.isuog.org, March 2019.
Leave feedback or submit an image
We rely on your feedback to update and improve VISUOG. Please use the form below to submit any comments or feedback you have on this chapter.
If you have any images that you think would make a good addition to this chapter, please also submit them below - you will be fully credited for all images used.
Feedback form
Please note that the maximum upload size is 5MB, and larger images and video clips can be sent to [email protected].
